本帖最后由 ambiva 于 2013-11-19 20:13 编辑
With LEDs we take theopposite approach. The life of an LED product is based on its lumendepreciation and the survival curve is given as extra information. Confusionhas been caused in the past by the LxFy term with which manufacturers tried tocombine lumen depreciation and survival in a single figure. You might haveseen, for example, L70F10 as a quoted lifetime where L70 is the time it takeslight to depreciate to 70 per cent and F10 represents the point at which 10 per cent of the lamps have failed. This isnot possible because both are unlikely to occur together. If you take the timeto a light depreciation of 70 per cent then the failures at that time areunlikely to be exactly 10 per cent. You can only specify one factor and theother has to follow from the data.
So let’s try to simplify things. The useful life of an LED productwill be the time to which a given light output remains (Lx) for a givenpercentage of the batch measured (By). So if I want to know how long it will bebefore the light has depreciated to 70 per cent for half of the measured batch,then we get L70B50 .Or we might decide that we actually only want 10 per centof the measured batch to be below 70 per cent light output so we get L70B10.If we compare this to the way we measure traditional lamps then itis most common to have 50 per cent above and 50 per cent below the quotedvalue, so the median is specified. To create a simple LED life definitionthat is equivalent to the way we deal with traditional lamps we use L70B50. Ifwe call this the median useful life, B50 is assumed and we just call it L70.For most applications we expect this to be the basic definition oflife in literature and packaging. This could become the standard way to definelife for LED products. However, in some applications – streetlighting, forexample – Lx may have to be achieved for more than half of the batch, in whichcase the useful life can be used with the y specified.Fade away or burn out?As with traditional lamps, extra information on abruptfailures is useful when evaluating a product’s performance. An abrupt failureis when the light output completely stops, and may be the result of a failureof a LED module, LED driver or even the complete LED luminaire. Again weare talking about statistics and probability. So the time to abrupt failure isthe length of time to a given percentage y of a batch failing to produce anylight. This is given by the term Cy.The time to abrupt failureis independent of the useful life, but it would be useful to have life andfailure values linked. At the median useful life (which is determined bygradual loss of light) we can have the abrupt failure value (which is determinedby complete loss of light). The abrupt failure value is the percentage of LED products that nolonger operate at the median useful life.When designing installations, professionals allow for loss oflight output, but it is usual to assume that any failed lamps will be replacedand so they are not included in the design calculation. In streetlighting, forexample, if 10 per cent of the lanterns fail, the average light leveldoesn’t fall by 10 per cent. Ten per cent of the installation will not be illuminatedat all. So multiplying light depreciation by abrupt failures doesn’t have anypractical use. However, to complete the picture we can introduce a furtherdefinition called the combined failure value which is the percentage of LEDproducts that have failed because of light loss and abrupt failure at therated median life.I have therefore introduced five definitions: